J. M. Kubler
To Win
H. Grenier
To Win
Jason Murray Kubler vs Yibing Wu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W W
Form
W W W L L L W W L LHead To Head: Kubler 1 - 1 Wu
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kubler winning 3 and Wu winning 2. The last match between Kubler and Wu was at the Orlando Challenger, 12-06-2022, Final, Hard with Yibing Wu getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jason Murray Kubler | 1 |
| Yibing Wu | 1 |
Orlando Challenger(12-06-2022)
6
7
6
4
3
1
| Kubler | Stats | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (23-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 307 | Ranking | 448 |
| 63 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 23 | Titles | 8 |
| 67% (437-213) | Career Total W/L | 63% (122-73) |
| $1,200,795 | Career Prize Money | $653,815 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Yibing Wu
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yibing Wu
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 23 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:7:17 | Average Match Time | 2:7:17 |
| 60% (101/167) | 1st Serve % | 70% (97/138) |
| 72% (73/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (64/97) |
| 45% (30/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (26/41) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (4/16) |
| 35% (48/138) | Return Points Win % | 38% (64/167) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Adam Walton
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
133)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
58 of
85)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Rei Sakamoto
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
9
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Jarrod Joyce
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yuichiro Inui
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yibing Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Yibing Wu
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
84 of
114)
16
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
84)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Yibing Wu
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Nicolas Jarry
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yibing Wu
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yibing Wu
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
17 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(5) 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Yibing Wu
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
112)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
54 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Rio Noguchi
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Keegan Smith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Fajing Sun
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (437/213) | Win/Loss | 63% (122/73) |
| 64% (970/544) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (273/179) |
| 55% (7867/6371) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2308/2025) |
| 66% (155/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (71/49) |
| 70% (243/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (30/18) |
| 38% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 91% (20/2) |
| 65% (33/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2106 | Aces Total | 693 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1800 | Total Double Faults | 379 |
| 1:9:1 | Average Match Time | 1:30:25 |
| 501.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 202.12 |
| 62% (18800/30559) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7912/12765) |
| 71% (13426/18800) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5409/7912) |
| 51% (5940/11758) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (2549/4853) |
| 44% (1384/3147) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (505/1211) |
| 40% (12359/30808) | Return Points Win % | 39% (4926/12585) |
| 51% (24/23) | Slam W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 36% (4/7) | Masters W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 47% (24/27) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (12/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (163/81) | Challenger W/L | 67% (56/27) |
| 75% (221/74) | Futures W/L | 71% (39/16) |
| 69% (418/609) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (115/176) |
| 48% (15/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 56% (112/201) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (41/74) |
| 57% (104/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 90% (416/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (116/104) |
| 9% (416/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (116/12) |
| 26% (234/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (78/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
